14 March 2018

Malawi: CSOs Score Legal Victory Against DPP in Blue Night Case - Judge Ntaba Orders Mediation

The governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) plea to discharge a case where five civil society organisations (CSOs) want the party to pay back K13.5 million it got from parastatals during its dinner and dance dubbed the Blue Night has been dismissed by the High Court in Zomba.

DPP is alleged to have solicited the from public institutions when it hosted the Blue Night at Kamuzu Palace in Lilongwe on July 29 last year where President Peter Mutharika was the guest of honour.

Lawyer Chimwemwe Sikwese representing DPP asked the court to dismiss the matter , arguing that the CSOs well ineligible to take the matter to court and that the proceedings were not properly commenced.

The CSOs are Centre for the Development of People (Cedep), Youth and Society (YAS), Human Rights Consultative Committee (HRCC), Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation (CHRR) and Livingstonia Synod's Church and Society Programme.

But in her determination on Tuesday, judge Zione Ntaba ruled that CSOs had "sufficient interest" in the matter and were within their right to lodge the court case.

The court recognised the role of human rights activists in the country in taking up cases of transparency and accountability on issues of financing of political parties which has a huge bearing on democratisation strongly entrenched in the Constitution as well as statutes.

Judge Ntaba ruled that the matter should proceed for mediation to be chaired by judge Redson Kapindu of thw High Court of Malawi Zomba District Registry.

"If mediation fails, then the court shall continue with submissions on originating summons on 16th June 2018," said the judge.

The court also ordered DPP to pay the CSOs incurred in the case.

Lawyer representing the CSOs, Wesley Mwafulirwa, said he was "delighted" with the court's determination.

Trapence, who was in court, said the ruling is a good pointer to the CSOs wish that the DPP should pay back all the money it received from th public institutions.

He commended the court for "defending democracy" and said it was victory for "principals of transparency and accountability."

This is one of the rare, but high profile cases of public finance management, where the conduct of a ruling party is being questioned in relation to abuse of public resources by soliciting money from parastatals for political activities.

The CSOs sought a declaration of the court that the donations the public institutions made to DPP contravene the doctrine of public trust, the Constitution and the Public Finance Management Act and it mounted to misuse and abuse of public resources.

Under Section 178 of the Constitution and Section 23 of the Public Finance Management Act, public money is not supposed to be expended unless authorised by an Appropriation Act or is a statutory expenditure.

As for expenditures by statutory corporations, Section 76 of the Public Finance Management Act provides that funds held by statutory bodies must only be applied for the purposes specified in the relevant empowering Acts.

Initially, when the CSOs, including Malawi Law Society (MLS), condemned DPP's collection of funds from the State agencies, DPP secretary general Greselder Jeffrey branded the criticisms as zachamba (nonsense), which angered the CSOs.

She later apologised for the uncouth language and engaged the CSOs in a dialogue that collapsed, leading to the court case.


Chilima Vindicated Again On Fraud Claims

Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi (Escom) has confirmed revelations by Vice-President Saulos Klaus Chilima (SKC),… Read more »

See What Everyone is Watching

Copyright © 2018 Nyasa Times. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.