A soldier, Mohammed Suleman, who was retired under controversial circumstances, on Monday, closed his case against the Nigerian Army at the National Industrial Court, Abuja.
Mr Suleman and 37 others were forcefully dismissed in 2016, without due process by the army.
In a letter notifying the soldiers of their sack, the Nigerian Army accused them of professional misconduct and added that the sack was a disciplinary measure.
They were neither brought before a court martial nor questioned on account of the allegations before their sack.
In a reaction, many of the sacked soldiers approached the NIC to demand their reinstatement.
While some of the cases have proceeded fairly in court, the Nigerian Army has attempted to frustrate the outcome of some others.
After presenting his last witness, David Ighodaro, on Monday, Mr Suleman's lawyers told the court of their desire to close their case while expecting the judgement of the Court.
Mr Ighodaro, who works with the legal services department of the Nigerian Army, had told the court in his brief adopted on Tuesday that the applicant was sacked by the army as a measure of discipline.
He however failed to give details of the events that gave rise to the requirement for the disciplinary measure.
According to Mr Ighodaro, "The army reserves the right to hire and fire its officers including the claimant for actions, conducts, among others which bother on indiscipline, unprofessionalism, threat to national security, among other reasons.
"Mr Ighodaro also added that the army council has no obligation or duty to even give reasons for the compulsory retirement of the claimant."
Responding to questions regarding the reasons for the controversial sack, Mr Ighodaro said he was not aware if Mr Suleman was ever questioned on the allegations against him, before the sack.
The case was adjourned till September 26 for adoption of written addresses.
Read the original article on Premium Times.
AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 150 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.
Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.
AllAfrica is a voice of, by and about Africa - aggregating, producing and distributing 600 news and information items daily from over 150 African news organizations and our own reporters to an African and global public. We operate from Cape Town, Dakar, Abuja, Monrovia, Nairobi and Washington DC.