Zimbabwe: Report Slams 'Porous' Kimberly Process

Photo: The Herald
Diamonds.
4 October 2019

A new report by a coalition of non-governmental organizations pushing for responsible investment in the extractive sector, has raised red flags over continued marketing and sale of modern-day blood diamonds.

With less than two months until the end of the Kimberley Process reform process, KP Civil Society Coalition says there is need to catch up with modern understandings of "conflict diamond", which are still permeating the international market.

The report, Real Care is Rare. An On-The-Ground Perspective of Blood Diamonds and the Fifth 'C', highlights the existence of modern day blood diamonds due to ongoing ties between diamonds and brutal human rights abuse in certain diamond mining locales on the African continent and beyond.

It also points out that the Kimberley Process only intervenes where rough diamonds are exploited by rebels to fight governments while leaving diamonds tainted by other types of violence or conflict to flow onto the global market certified 'conflict free'.

"Many people have been aware of this problem for years but the KP is still dragging its feet on expanding its scope to deal with these problems," said KP Civil Society Coalition spokesperson, Shamiso Mtisi.

Some cases spotlighted in the report include a failure to intervene where armed groups are exploiting diamonds without fighting governments; illegal military involvement in the diamond trade; and the perpetration of torture and killings against artisanal miners to clear diamond fields or secure industrial concessions - acts that continue to this day.

The report voices rising concerns that commercial dynamics in the diamond sector ensure the continuation of such abuses despite industry schemes to prevent them, by creating a secondary market for cheaper unethical diamonds.

The KP Civil Society Coalition points out that, whilst some states may see hindering Kimberley Process reform as protecting their commercial interests, many seasoned industry actors understand the reputational risks to the entire diamond sector if the KP fails to modernize.

Market research highlights a new generation of consumers more socially conscious than ever. For these buyers, the continuation of serious abuse where a forum like the KP claims to unite stakeholders to help protect communities starts to raise credibility issues not just for the KP but for the diamond sector as a whole.

The report highlights that this new wave of conscientious consumer continues to find testimonial and photographic evidence depicting the grim realities of diamond related abuse publicly circulating.

It highlights the serious implications of this for diamond branding and that this threat can only truly be addressed through international cooperation.

The need for more targeted KP interventions to make this practically workable without causing undue harm to other diamond dependents is emphasized.

Having attended recent reform talks Filip Reyniers director of International Peace Information Services (IPIS), a KP civil society coalition member is quoted in the report stating that the need for reform on definition of conflict was long overdue.

He said the new report will eliminate any doubts that current definition of conflict diamonds was limited and gave empirical evidence which some governments have been demanding.

"The KP still seems to be struggling to find consensus. Despite strong civil society and even industry outcry over the last decade, some government representatives are demanding evidence of the need for a new definition of conflict diamonds. This new report should help to eliminate their doubts," said Reyniers.

The Kimberley Process (KP) is an international mechanism intended to prevent the flow of conflict diamonds onto the global market through the implementation of an import/export certification scheme applicable to rough diamonds.

See What Everyone is Watching

More From: 263Chat

Don't Miss

AllAfrica publishes around 700 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.