Ghana: MPs Denying GPHA of Reefer Container Revenues ---MDU

10 October 2019

The Maritime and Dockworkers' Union (MDU) of the Ghana Trades Union Congress (TUC) says the Meridian Ports and Services (MPS) has taken over handling of reefer containers at the expense of Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority (GPHA) revenue mobilisation.

The MDU revealed this on Monday at a press conference on the negotiations for the review of unfavourable clauses in the MPS terminal three concession agreement.

Mr Daniel Owusu-Koranteng, General Secretary, MDU said: "The Ghana Revenue Authority has put up measures which had placed the handling of reefer containers in the hands of MPS in Terminal 3 thus denying GPHA of huge revenues though reefer containers are not covered by the concession agreement."

He said that by that arrangement, MPS had become the beneficiary of revenues accruing from the reefer container business, which they described as a bonus on to top of the generous incentives provided in the concession agreement.

He recounted that the GPHA constructed its reefer terminal which had a capacity of 800 TEUs (Twenty Foot Equivalent units) equipped with two generators with generating power capacity of 1.2MVA.

He added that the terminal generated substantial revenues to the GPHA in the form of electricity charges, rent, ICD handling charges, handling charges, and transfer charges among others.

He said, "We are calling on the government to find a solution to the takeover of the reefer container business from GPHA under the cloak of loss of reefer containers as a matter of urgency" adding that genuine security lapses at the GPHA reefer container terminal must be fixed if they truly existed.

The union stressed that "the directive of Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) on reefer container business amounts to throwing away the baby with the bathwater".

Touching on the ongoing negotiation of the concession, he reminded the government that MPS terminal three project was a good project with a bad agreement noting that it would result in the loss of substantial revenues of GPHA as there would be reduction of stevedoring, shore handling works, port dues, terminal area fee among others.

He added that the ministerial report on the concession raised questions on the period of the agreement stating that "it is not clear whether the concession agreement is for 15 years or 35 years. We are also not clear about when to start counting the contract period of the agreement".

The MDU General Secretary indicated that even though they participated in the negotiations of the agreement with the expectation of ensuring adequate revenue generation and job retention for GPHA, MPS had turned the meetings into a forum for the protection of the investment agreement even if it would weaken GPHA revenue generation capacity and the subsequent massive job losses of its workers.

"After five meetings of the negotiation team, the MPH group has maintained its position of proffering palliative solutions to the problem of revenue generation and job losses with the reason that they would lose their investment protection if they accept the proposals of GPHA. The irony is that whilst GPHA as a landlord needs the 20 per cent of eligible vessels to survive, MPS wants to maintain its investment and profit levels gained from a flawed procurement process," he said.

Mr Joshua Ansah, Deputy General Secretary of the TUC, on his part, assured workers of the GPHA that the union was solidly behind them in fighting for a favourable review of the concession as they were fighting for GPHA to keep doing what it had been doing for years.

See What Everyone is Watching

More From: Ghanaian Times

Don't Miss

AllAfrica publishes around 700 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.