Nigeria: NEPU - Recalling When Ideology Mattered to Nigerian Parties

opinion

The discussions on the politics of NEPU was very rich because it drew attention to what political parties are supposed to exist for. The first issue was that back in the day they were clear about what they stood for - good or bad, and they had a structure that reflected their nature.

This year, the Mambaiyya House Annual Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU) Anniversary Lecture was used to mark 70 years of the party's formation. The theme was "Party Ideology and Supremacy: The Example of NEPU". It held on Saturday, August 8, exactly 70 years after the party's establishment and I had the privilege of moderating the zoom event. The key speakers, Professor Habu Mohammed and Dr. Saidu Ahmad Dukawa, were excellent and the centre's director, Professor Ismaila Zango has remained faithful to the vocation of keeping the history of progressive politics that Kano was famous for alive.

The key problematic posed was that no one today has any inkling what any of our country's political parties stand for. To be clear, they do not stand for anything, which is why party barons move with such ease between parties, with regularity and without shame. These party barons themselves have no ideological or programmatic platform governing their engagement in politics. The result is that it is today impossible to differentiate the parties in terms of ideology, programmes or political objectives beyond grabbing power. They have evacuated the essential question of: What is power for?

The discussions on the politics of NEPU was very rich because it drew attention to what political parties are supposed to exist for. The first issue was that back in the day they were clear about what they stood for - good or bad, and they had a structure that reflected their nature. The Northern Peoples' Congress was the party of the Northern aristocracy and it was structured around the the system of Native Administration, which they controlled. It was conservative, it believed in maintaining stability and the power it controlled. It was the party of what Max Weber would call "eternal yesterday". To ensure that yesterday's men would control power tomorrow, it was ruthless in using the repressive power of the state to deal with its opposition. NEPU, on the other hand, was not shy to define itself as a party for radical change that was engaged in class struggle to emancipate the oppressed masses, the talakawa. The leaders of NEPU were well versed in Islamic knowledge and used the knowledge to justify the struggle as being in conformity with the religion of the people.

Party financing was very important, except for the NPC, and it came from ordinary members who would contribute three pence in their weekly ward meetings and fund party activities. They knew the party belonged to them because they were the ones who funded it. They obeyed party decisions because they were collective decisions and party supremacy existed...

For both parties, membership was important and a determining character. The NPC was faithful to its nature and saw membership as voting power delivered by emirs and chiefs. Its politics, therefore, was to keep the aristocracy happy, as long as they towed the line and obeyed their political bosses. When Emir Muhammadu Sanusi did not toe the line, he was summarily removed from the exalted office of the emir of Kano. I am here referring to the grandfather of the emir of Kano recently removed for the same reason - at least some things remain the same. For NEPU, its membership was derived from the common people, tailors, peasants, traders and teachers. They saw the party as theirs, met weekly to discuss party affairs and were sovereign members who determined party leadership at conventions. They believed in their party, stood for it through trials and tribulations and each member knew exactly what their party stood for.

Party financing was very important, except for the NPC, and it came from ordinary members who would contribute three pence in their weekly ward meetings and fund party activities. They knew the party belonged to them because they were the ones who funded it. They obeyed party decisions because they were collective decisions and party supremacy existed because they saw the party as their own making. NEPU members suffered enormously from oppression and torture and imprisonment was common, and even with that, a great majority would not change their party. During the Webinar, a lot of discussion was on the NEPU ideology, so well expressed it its Sawaba (Freedom) Declaration, and many participants asked for copies of the document. Find below the Declaration, which was clearly inspired by The Communist Manifesto. It starts with a call for radical change, provides the analysis that justified the change, identifies the core political objective of liberty, gives the reason why it must be secured by the talakawa themselves and the centrality of class struggle in the conduct of politics.

SAWABA DECLARATION, Kano, 1950

The Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU) holds:

1. That the shocking state of social order as at present existing in northern Nigeria is due to nothing but the Family Compact rule of the so-called Native Administration in their present autocratic form.

2. That owing to this unscrupulous and vicious system of administration by the Family Compact rulers and which has been established and fully supported by the British Imperialist Government, there is today in our society an antagonism of interest, manifesting itself as a class struggle between the members of the vicious circle of Native Administration on the one hand and the ordinary Talakawa on the other.

3. That this antagonism can be abolished only by the emancipation of the Talakawa from the domination of these privileged few and by the reform of the present autocratic political institutions into Democratic Institutions and placing their Democratic control in the hands of the Talakawa for whom alone they exist.

4. That this emancipation must be the work of the Talakawa themselves.

5. That as at present, the Machinery of Government, including the armed forces of the nation, exist only to conserve the privilege of this selfish minority group. The Talakawa must organize consciously and politically for the conquest of the powers of government - both nationally and locally - in order that this machinery of government, including these forces, may be converted from an instrument of oppression into the agent of emancipation, and the overthrow of bureaucracy and autocratic privilege.

6. That all political parties are but the expression of class interest, and as the interest of the Talakawa is diametrically opposed to the interest of all sections of the master class, both white and black, the party seeking the emancipation of the Talakawa must naturally be hostile to the party of the oppressors.

7. The Northern Elements Progressive Union of Northern Nigeria, therefore, being the only political party of the Talakawa, enters the field of political action determined to reduce to nonentity any party of hypocrites and traitors to our mother country, and calls upon all the sons and daughters of Northern Nigeria to muster under its banner to the end, that a speedy termination may be wrought to this vicious system of administration which deprives them of the fruits of their labour, and that POVERTY may give place to COMFORT, PRIVILEGE to EQUALITY, and political, economic and social SLAVERY to FREEDOM."

SOURCE: Appendix IV, page 238 in A. D. Yahaya "The Native Authority System in Northern Nigeria", Ahmadu Bello University Press, Zaria, 1980.

A professor of Political Science and development consultant/expert, Jibrin Ibrahim is a Senior Fellow of the Centre for Democracy and Development, and Chair of the Editorial Board of PREMIUM TIMES.

More From: Premium Times

Don't Miss

AllAfrica publishes around 900 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.