Ethiopia's Communal Forests Good Governance Experiences

Forest plays an important role in climate regulation and carbon sequestration. But efforts to restore it demands determination, resources as well expertise. According to forestsnews.cifor.org, written by Natasha Vizcarra, montane grasslands and forests dominate the Bale mountain region in Oromia, Ethiopia. Like most of the rugged Ethiopian Highlands, Bale is home to endemic flora and fauna such as the African redwood, the giant lobelia, the Ethiopian wolf and Prince Ruspoli's Turaco, a species of green bird with a blond mohawk.

However, rising urban populations and the unsustainable management of forests has led to forest degradation in Bale and the nearby Jamma-Urji mountain region. A dense forest covered the Jamma-Urji area decades ago, but over time has gradually been replaced by shrub and bare land, threatening the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities.

Deforestation and degradation have led to food shortages, increased poverty, water and energy crises. These changes prompted the Ethiopian government to form multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) in collaboration with international donors and civil society organizations, to conserve the region's forests with the participation of local communities.

An analysis of two MSFs, published recently by the International Forestry Review, revealed that they are viewed with optimism in Ethiopia's forestry sector. "A majority of the participants we interviewed believe that holding MSFs improve participation and collaboration across sectors and can potentially address power imbalances among stakeholders," said Mastewal Yami, a policy and institutional scientist and the lead author of the study.

Montane grasslands and forests dominate the Bale mountain region in Oromia, Ethiopia. Like most of the rugged Ethiopian Highlands, Bale is home to endemic flora and fauna such as the African redwood, the giant lobelia, the Ethiopian wolf and Prince Ruspoli's Turaco, a species of green bird with a blond mohawk.

However, rising urban populations and the unsustainable management of forests has led to forest degradation in Bale and the nearby Jamma-Urji mountain region. A dense forest covered the Jamma-Urji area decades ago, but over time has gradually been replaced by shrub and bare land, threatening the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities.

Deforestation and degradation have led to food shortages, increased poverty, water and energy crises. These changes prompted the Ethiopian government to form multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) in collaboration with international donors and civil society organizations, to conserve the region's forests with the participation of local communities.

An analysis of two MSFs, published recently by the International Forestry Review, revealed that they are viewed with optimism in Ethiopia's forestry sector. "A majority of the participants we interviewed believe that holding MSFs improve participation and collaboration across sectors and can potentially address power imbalances among stakeholders," said Mastewal Yami, a policy and institutional scientist and the lead author of the study.

The communities showing high interest in putting in place good governance in the forest administration thereby ensure sustainable benefit. "Historically, we have had a huge deforestation problem in Ethiopia," Yami said. "The key reason for that, apart from the biophysical factors, is a problem of governance." Poor communities lacked equitable access to the forests, and the Ethiopian government realized the need to improve benefit-sharing among forest users.

Good governance is defined as "a decision-making process in which diverse groups of stakeholders with varied interests, capacities, and power relations collaborate to achieve the sustainable management of communal forests." It has dominated the development discourse in Africa since the 1980s when the World Bank introduced it as a criterion for development assistance.

The study authors see MSFs as a platform that supports good governance, as it is a participatory process that encourages stakeholder involvement, building trust and shared understanding among different stakeholder groups in forest management. "In this regard, I think people have been optimistic about MSFs in improving governance of communal forests," Yami said.

Partner's role in managing communal forests was fundamental. The study also showed that the Ethiopian government plays a crucial role in the successful governance of communal forests. MSF participants believe that if their forum is "embedded" in the government--in other words, formally adopted as part of their good governance procedures in conserving or restoring communal forests -- then the government can effectively mobilize resources, enforce conservation rules and help achieve the goals of the MSF.

It suggests that "failing to substantially engage the government in MSFs could either limit the success of the MSFs in bringing change in the governance of communal forests or limit the changes to the local community level." The caveat is that stakeholders need to make sure the government does not end up controlling the MSF's process and outcomes, the study states.

The overall success and a failure of the effort, Yami and her colleagues studied the Support for Horn of Africa Resilience-Bale-Eco-region (SHARE-BER) MSF, which existed from 2014 to 2017, and the Jamma-Urji Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration MSF which was active from 2014 to 2016.

Both forums focused on the conservation or restoration of communal forests--38,036 square kilometres in Bale, most of it within the Bale Mountains National Park, and 65 square kilometres between the Jamma and Urji mountains between Shashshemene and Shalla Woredas in the West Arsi zone. Communal forests in Ethiopia are managed by local communities with the support of local administrative institutions. Bylaws define who can use the resources, how these can be accessed, and guidelines for mobilizing collective action to prevent degradation.

The Bale and Jamma-Urji MSFs focused on the rehabilitation of degraded areas of the forests, biodiversity conservation and the development of land-use plans. But while organizers and participants in the study perceived the Bale MSF as successful, they viewed the Jamma-Urji MSF as one that had failed.

The study attributed the Bale MSF's success to its use of the multisectoral approach in planning and implementation. Participants said the approach improved the enforcement of the communal forests' rules, thus supporting the MSF's conservation goals. Participatory Forest Management (PFM) Cooperatives and multi-stakeholder task forces also helped in rule enforcement, such as preventing people from encroaching into the forest and clearing it for firewood or farming as part of their livelihoods.

Forest encroachment and clearing was a bigger problem in Jamma-Urji. Interviewees in the area attributed this to the lack of attention and action on the dependence of women and youth on forest resources. With few alternative livelihood options, they have for years resorted to free grazing in the forest. The Jamma-Urji MSF declared the area as an enclosure to restore the degraded land. And although the MSF formed a PFM cooperative to protect the area, it failed to enforce its bylaws.

Gaps observed in representation

Neither of the MSFs was effective in ensuring gender equity within their membership bodies, although this was more evident in Jamma-Urji. The study revealed that MSFs typically address gender inequity by setting minimum participation quotas for women in PFM cooperative committees. However, the quotas have not resulted in meaningful gender representation. "The practice of assigning women to PFM cooperative committees could aggravate the existing gender inequity, as, putting women in time-consuming and less powerful positions could discourage them from actively engaging in decision-making processes," the study authors wrote.

MSFs have also resorted to filling quotas for women by counting female stakeholders from other groups such as the government, non-governmental or civil society organizations, instead of reserving the quotas for women in the community, according to the study. "In practice, women have not been allowed to contribute to the good governance of communal forests because they have time constraints," Yami said. "They often have to balance their leadership roles in MSFs with domestic responsibilities such as child care."

"Our main recommendation is MSFs need to do more work in addressing the gender-based constraints that women face," Yami said. "So, it is best to identify those key gender constraints and address them specific to the context." The authors also recommend more capacity development and economic empowerment support for women to enable them to occupy meaningful leadership roles in the management of communal forests.

Selected approaches, overall, the analysis of the two MSFs shows that a mix of top-down and bottom-up approaches may be more suited to support good governance in communal forests. Examples of top-down approaches include embedding the MSF in government and rule enforcement by the government. Examples of bottom-up approaches, on the other hand, include collaborations between NGOs and multi-stakeholder task forces that have been successfully used by the Bale MSF.

With these approaches, the study recommends that to support good governance MSFs need to prioritize inclusiveness among all stakeholders, balance power relations, enable joint planning and implementation and determine the effectiveness of MSFs and the credibility of outcomes among stakeholders. "Earlier, when I began studying the role of the government in forest governance, I used to think the community can do better than the government," Yami said.

BY MENGISTEAB TESHOME

More From: Ethiopian Herald

Don't Miss

AllAfrica publishes around 900 reports a day from more than 130 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.

X