Sudan: FFC-CC Walk Out From Political Dialogue Due to FFC-NA Presence

6 September 2022

Khartoum — The mainstream Forces for Freedom and Change-Central Council (FFC-CC) withdrew from an informal meeting called by the Sudan Quartet (United States of America, Britain, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) with rebel movements and the military on Saturday.

The meeting was held at the invitation of the Quartet and was supposed to include representatives of the military junta, the rebel movements that signed the Juba Peace Agreement with the Sudanese government in October 2020, and the FFC-CC.

Jaafar Hasan, a leading member of the FFC-CC, told Radio Dabanga that their delegation withdrew from the meeting after noticing the presence of members of the National Accord Forces (NAF), which is dominated by Darfur rebel movements, while the other rebel movements were absent.

"We consider this like dumping the political process," he said. The meeting was cancelled after their withdrawal.

The National Accord Forces is another name for the Forces for Freedom and Change-National Accord (FFC-NA), an FFC split-off group under the leadership of Mubarak Ardol* who has supported the coup in various instances.

A leading member of the National Umma Party Siddig Ismail told Medameek news that the meeting ended after the FFC-CC refused the participation of Minni Minawi, who was representing the NAF, given that the invitation was for those who signed Juba Peace Agreement, before the NAF split off and came into being.

Hasan said that the FFC-CC "pursues several methods to bring down the coup regime, including a political process, street escalation, and international cooperation".

Sources reported that the military junta did not send a delegation to the meeting despite being invited to it, which was also seen as problematic by the FFC-CC.

The FFC-CC did clarify to Medameek news that their participation in a meeting with the military junta only had the aim to clarify their 'declared and firm' position in opposition of the October 25 military coup and in favour of a civilian-led democratic transition.

The FFC-CC has been criticised in the past for its willingness to enter dialogue with the military junta responsible for the coup.

NAF critique

Mubarak Ardol, Secretary-General of the National Accord Forces, criticised the approach of the international Quartet to solve the political crisis.

He said yesterday that the last call made by the Quartet was an "exclusionary scheme" as it was limited to the military, the FFC-CC, the Sudan Liberation Movement, and the Justice and Equality Movement.

"Excluding components such as the mainstream Democratic Unionist Party, the Sudan People's Call initiative, and the youth of the resistance committees from the dialogue can only lead to devastation that exceeds the situation before October 25," he stated.

The Democratic Unionist Party, the oldest political party in Sudan, is an ally of the NAF. The Sudan People's Call is an alliance of right-wing groups, including allies of the ousted Islamist dictatorship of Omar Al Bashir, and was established in July this year. They want the army to be the "supreme authority" in Sudan.

The country's resistance committees categorically reject any dialogue with the military.

Dialogues between different political groups in Sudan have been taking place for months to find a solution to the political crisis after the military took power on October 25, 2021.

* Last year, a group dominated by members of former rebel movements split off and formed the FFC-National Accord faction. The faction, also known as the National Accord Forces, is chaired by Mubarak Ardol, the former spokesmen for the Sudan People Liberation Movement-North, who became director of the Sudanese Company for Mineral Resources with friendly ties to the then-ruling National Congress Party of dictator Omar Al Bashir.Sudanese social media activists regularly call someone whom they consider a defector from the revolutionary course or any politician they do not trust 'Ardoli' or 'Ardolian'.

AllAfrica publishes around 400 reports a day from more than 100 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.