South Africa: Health Department Has Not Fully Implemented Court Order, Say Lawyers

Masego Mafata/GroundUp
Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital was a respondent in a court case brought by SECTION27 to ensure undocumented pregnant and breastfeeding women and children under six receive free care at public health facilities (file photo).
26 October 2023
GroundUp (Cape Town)
By Ella Morrison

The department was ordered to put notices up in hospitals and clinics stating that children under six and pregnant and breastfeeding women are eligible for free health care irrespective of nationality

  • In April 2022 SECTION27 filed an application to allow pregnant and breastfeeding women and children under six access to free health care at public health institutions, regardless of nationality or documentation status.
  • The application argued that treatment was a matter of chance, depending on the hospital or the member of staff, and that the official policy was unconstitutional.
  • Operation Dudula blocked foreign nationals from hospitals and clinics in Gauteng from late 2022 to mid-2023.
  • In April 2023 the Gauteng High Court upheld SECTION27's application and ordered every public hospital in the country to display a notice.
  • SECTION27 reported to the court that some Gauteng health facilities had failed to put up these posters by the October deadline.
  • The court has given the relevant hospitals until 6 November to fully comply with the order.
  • Judge Roland Sutherland will visit hospitals that fail to comply on 20 November.

SECTION27, a public interest law organisation, has called on the Gauteng health department to do a better job implementing a court order affecting the rights of immigrants.

The national health department was ordered by the Gauteng High Court in April to put notices up in all public health facilities across the country stating that pregnant and breastfeeding women, as well as children under six, were entitled to free health care irrespective of whether they are citizens or properly documented.

The court specifically ordered the Gauteng health department to put up these posters before appearing in court chambers on 23 October.

SECTION27, which brought the application in April 2022, has been monitoring the implementation of the court order. And while it has complimented the government on implementing it widely, it has also accused the Gauteng health department of failing to fully comply.

Many hospitals and clinics have not put up posters or have failed to make them properly visible, says SECTION27. The hospitals and clinics have until 6 November to comply. If they fail to comply, following more monitoring from SECTION27, Judge Roland Sutherland will visit the relevant hospitals and clinics on 20 November.

Now, public health institutions can only turn away women and children if they are insured by a medical aid scheme or came to South Africa specifically seeking free health care.

At the beginning of the year, Operation Dudula blocked immigrants from clinics and hospitals in Johannesburg and Tshwane. In August, Dudula allegedly performed ID, accent and skin colour checks on patients and staff at Kalafong Hospital in Tshwane. Police were called to enforce an interdict obtained by the Gauteng health department against Dudula.

The group is now running as a political party in the upcoming 2024 elections. The party's spokesperson told The Guardian that it will no longer engage in its previous tactics, that it is "demilitarising" but that its core ideology has not changed and that it views "illegal immigrants as criminals" who must "go back to their countries".

Umunyana Rugege, director of SECTION27, claimed that the department's "discriminatory institutional policies and systemic xenophobic practices and attitudes have detrimental and sometimes fatal consequences" within public health institutions.

The application showed that the policy excluding pregnant women and children under six was applied by Gauteng health care centres on an "arbitrary and ad hoc basis". Even within hospitals, access to treatment depended on the day and the official on duty.

According to SECTION27, Gauteng hospitals and clinics would sometimes require migrants and refugees to establish their means and nationality before accessing treatment and the Gauteng health regulations allowed this.

The court order found the regulations to be inconsistent with the National Health Act.

SECTION27's application describes specific incidents. At eight-months pregnant, Kamba Azama, an asylum seeker from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, was referred to Charlotte Maxeke Hospital because her high blood pressure posed a risk to her baby. She was told to pay R20,000 to receive treatment and give birth at the hospital. SECTION27 was able to secure her an appointment, but the unborn child died the night before.

In the application, Rugege said that Azama probably would have delivered a healthy baby if she had received urgent treatment under a consistent hospital policy.

SECTION27 has been receiving cases like this since 2013.

According to SECTION27's media release, the amended policy now allows asylum seekers like Azama the same access to health care as refugees. Other than pregnant and breastfeeding women and children under six, refugees are means-tested to determine how much they should pay for healthcare.

The application was supported by the Jesuit Refugee Service, The Southern African HIV Clinicians Society, and Doctors Without Borders.

The respondents included the MEC and head of the Gauteng health department, the national minister and national director-general of health, and Charlotte Maxeke hospital.

A request for comment from the Gauteng health department was unanswered at the time of publication.

Read the original article on GroundUp.

Tagged:
Copyright © 2023 GroundUp. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica publishes around 400 reports a day from more than 100 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.