International trade soared as the world recovered from the Covid-19 induced economic crisis. In 2022, the value of traded goods and services was 24 percent higher than in 2019, before the pandemic struck. But in 2023, trade hit a wall, barely eking out a 0.1 percent gain over the previous year, as underlined in the World Bank's Trade Watch. It took strong growth in services trade to make up for the first decline in goods trade in 20 years outside of a recession.
Where do we go from here? The World Bank's latest Global Economic Prospects report predicts that trade will recover slightly in 2024 and 2025 as pre-pandemic patterns reassert themselves. Trade is expected to mirror projected weak growth in global output and investment.
On the other hand, pessimists might say that 2023 marks the beginning of a new normal for trade in a world best by geopolitical tensions, climate-related shocks, and increased protectionism in advanced and large economies. That dark scenario spells trouble for developing countries, which need trade, foreign investment, and participation in global value chains to eliminate poverty and ensure their green transition.
Yet there are grounds for optimism. Three drivers suggest that international trade could resume its role as a powerful force for job creation and poverty reduction.
The first is the observed resilience of global and regional value chains, which played a key role in helping many developing countries leverage trade for development in recent decades. While sanctions imposed on Russia and US efforts to decouple from China reduced direct trade between these blocs, indirect and regional trade often compensated for the decline, and developing countries kept on trading with the various blocs. This resilience shows that it's not easy to completely unroll global supply chains built over decades to best serve firms and customers across the globe amid various shocks.
- Advertisement -The second driver is robust growth of trade in services, especially those that are digitally delivered, despite high levels of restrictiveness. Trade in services brings immense opportunities for more and better jobs in developing countries and sharpens export competitiveness through imports of efficient business services that, in turn, serve as inputs to other goods and services.
The third driver is growth in climate-related trade. Climate change, and policies to counter it, are already redistributing comparative advantages, and the induced specialization gains it may generate will significantly contribute to needed reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions. New trade flows could be created with investments rightly deployed in countries offering these new green comparative advantages. Moreover, the anticipated boom in demand for environmental goods such as solar panels will generate ample trade opportunities and potential to develop new global and regional green value chains, from the extraction of lithium to the assembly of electrical vehicles.
Yet these drivers shouldn't make us complacent. Leveraging them will require decisive action from all trade players.
Developing countries will need to improve their trade infrastructure--highways, customs procedures, and the like--and logistics systems to meet the standards of reliability demanded in most export markets. And to maintain access to those markets, they will also have to meet strict new standards for environmental sustainability.
On the policy side, developing countries can improve competitiveness and join emerging green value chains by reducing barriers to imports of environmental technology and services. They should refrain from retaliating against protectionist measures of more advanced economies, which would only serve to discourage private investment, domestic and foreign. Instead, they could deepen regional integration by addressing behind-the-border issues related notably to competition and investment, while ensuring that preferential trade agreements are consistent with global rules of the road. They may also consider strengthening their enabling regulatory environment, e.g., personal data protection and rules on cross-border data flows, to foster digital trade as becoming more secure.
For their part, advanced economies should ensure that increasingly ambitious measures to reduce greenhouse gas-emissions throughout entire value chains--such as charges on imports of goods with relatively high carbon content or anti deforestation policies--do not unduly restrict market access for firms in developing countries. Crucially, advanced economies must ensure that environmental standards and compliance mechanisms are harmonized to avoid creating a spaghetti bowl of complex and contradictory regulations. Otherwise, risks are high that trade will be polarized between a green bloc and a brown one, with uncertain consequences for the reduction of GhG emissions.
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
Together, developed and developing countries alike must embrace public goods in the global trade architecture, such as subsidies for green technologies and freer trade in environmental goods and services - while continuing to prevent the use of subsidies solely for competitiveness gains. Also needed will be stronger regulatory cooperation in services and accelerated Aid for Trade to address impediments to commerce in developing countries.
Finally, reinvigorating trade requires revamping the core functions of a rules-based trading system, while taking into consideration emerging concerns from both developed and developing economies. This will ensure a level playing field and allow developing countries to lock in their policy reform commitments into credible trade agreements and attract foreign direct investment.
(Sébastien Dessus is the manager of the Global Trade and Regional Integration Unit at the World Bank. He holds a PhD in economics from Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University and has published extensively in academic journals and books.)
Contributed by Sébastien Dessus
