As Uganda prepares for the 2026 general elections, the Electoral Commission's roadmap has ignited widespread criticism from opposition parties and political analysts.
Accusations of opaque processes, compressed timelines, and insufficient stakeholder involvement have raised serious questions about the roadmap's fairness and inclusivity, casting doubt on the credibility of the upcoming polls.
The roadmap outlines key milestones for the electoral process, including voter registration, boundary demarcations, and campaign schedules.
However, critics claim that the implementation of these activities has been marred by poor communication and unexplained changes.
Adjustments to electoral boundaries and campaign timelines, in particular, have reportedly been introduced without sufficient public consultation, fueling allegations of bias and deepening mistrust.
Opposition parties--including the National Unity Platform (NUP), Democratic Party (DP), and Uganda People's Congress (UPC)--have been vocal in their dissatisfaction.
They argue that the roadmap is skewed in favor of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM), citing examples such as the Kisoro by-election, where opposition candidates were allegedly given less time to campaign than their NRM counterparts.
"This roadmap falls short of the transparency and fairness required for credible elections," said Gerald Siranda, Secretary General of the Democratic Party (DP).
"Critical elements like boundary demarcations and campaign timelines have been introduced without adequate consultation. This lack of engagement undermines public trust and raises questions about the intentions behind these changes."
Adding to the uncertainty is the delay in implementing crucial electoral reforms, expected to be spearheaded by Minister of Justice Nobert Mao.
With less than two years to go, concerns are mounting that proposed reforms on campaign financing, voter education, and political party regulations may not be effectively executed in time.
For many, this delay represents a missed opportunity to level the electoral playing field and address longstanding structural inequities.
The Electoral Commission's history of perceived partiality has further compounded opposition frustrations, with many questioning its independence and commitment to delivering a fair process.
Political analysts warn that if these issues are not resolved, the ramifications could be severe.
A lack of transparency and inclusivity risks alienating key political players, undermining public trust in democratic institutions, and triggering post-election disputes.
Moreover, the absence of timely reforms could entrench systemic inequalities, thwarting efforts to foster a genuinely inclusive political environment.
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
"The stakes are incredibly high for Uganda," remarked one political analyst.
"An election is not just about voting--it's about ensuring that the process reflects the will of the people. If the roadmap continues to fall short, the entire democratic system could be compromised."
With the clock ticking toward the 2026 elections, the pressure is mounting on the Electoral Commission and the government to address these concerns.
A transparent, inclusive, and credible electoral process is not just a political necessity--it is essential for preserving Uganda's fragile democracy and fostering public confidence in its institutions.
The question remains: will the Electoral Commission rise to the occasion, or will the roadmap become a symbol of missed opportunities and deepened divisions? Only time will tell.
