Malawi's hunger story is one of paradox and pain -- a nation that spends trillions of kwacha to feed itself, yet its people still queue for maize and battle starvation. Over the past five years, government spending on maize-related programs has exceeded K1 trillion, yet hunger, high prices, and shortages remain the order of the day.
So, what exactly is going wrong?
1. Money without Mindset: The AIP Trap
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
The Affordable Inputs Programme (AIP) was meant to be Malawi's silver bullet -- a way to empower smallholder farmers through cheap fertilizer and seed. Instead, it has become a black hole sucking up public funds.
Between 2020 and 2025, AIP's budget more than doubled, averaging K135 billion a year. It was later paired with the National Economic Empowerment Fund (NEEF), which added another K140 billion to finance fertilizer loans. Yet the nation's annual maize output only inched from 3.1 million metric tonnes to 3.5 million -- a meagre gain compared to the astronomical spending.
The result? A trillion kwacha spent, with hunger still biting.
2. Productivity Crisis: Depleted Soils, Stagnant Yields
Experts say the real problem isn't just about inputs -- it's about soil health and farm systems. Malawi's soils are badly degraded after decades of overuse, erosion, and poor crop rotation. Fertilizer alone cannot fix dead soil.
According to the Mwapata Policy Institute, Malawi's low yields will persist unless there's serious investment in soil rehabilitation, irrigation, and sustainable farming practices. "We keep pouring fertilizer into exhausted land," one analyst remarked, "expecting miracles that never come."
3. Politics Over Policy: Feeding Votes, Not the Nation
Every election season, the AIP becomes more of a political slogan than a development tool. Fertilizer coupons are distributed not on merit or efficiency but on political loyalty and patronage.
This turns what should be an agricultural productivity program into a vote-buying machine, draining resources while leaving real farmers sidelined.
4. Price Madness: When Food Becomes a Luxury
Despite all this spending, maize prices have exploded -- from K215 per kilogram in 2020 to K1,300 in 2025. For millions of Malawians living on less than K2,000 a day, maize has become a luxury item.
The government recently announced it will borrow K378 billion to buy 200,000 metric tonnes of maize to stabilize supply -- this, after already spending over K300 billion to support production. It's a vicious cycle of spending more to produce less.
5. Structural Flaws: Too Many Hands, No Clear Plan
Malawi's food system is managed by a maze of institutions -- the Ministry of Agriculture, NEEF, ADMARC, NFRA, and several donor-funded agencies -- yet coordination remains a nightmare.
Each operates with overlapping mandates, conflicting targets, and weak accountability. As one observer put it: "Everyone is feeding from the maize pot, but no one is feeding the nation."
6. The Way Forward: From Feeding to Farming
Experts agree: Malawi must stop chasing short-term political fixes and start building long-term agricultural resilience.
That means:
Investing in irrigation and winter cropping, especially in areas with residual moisture and reliable water sources.
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
Shifting from subsistence to commercial farming, supporting farmers who produce for the market, not just for survival.
Restoring soil health, through organic matter, crop rotation, and conservation agriculture.
Diversifying crops, to reduce overreliance on maize.
The Bottom Line:
Malawi is not hungry because it lacks resources -- it is hungry because it misuses them. Trillions have been poured into programs that are politically loud but economically hollow. The AIP was meant to end hunger; instead, it has entrenched dependence and inefficiency.
Until the nation stops treating maize as politics and starts treating agriculture as business, Malawi will keep spending billions just to remain hungry.
The problem isn't the rain or the soil. It's the system.
