Nairobi — A public interest petitioner has moved to the High Court seeking urgent intervention over alleged ethnic imbalance in senior leadership at the Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited (KETRACO).
In a constitutional petition filed at the Constitutional and Human Rights Division in Nairobi, Benjamin Okumu accuses the KETRACO Board of Directors of presiding over recruitment and appointment processes that have resulted in disproportionate representation of one ethnic community within the State corporation's top management.
According to court documents, several senior executives were removed and replaced shortly after the current Board took office, leading to five out of nine executive committee positions being held by individuals from a single ethnic community--about 63 per cent of KETRACO's executive leadership.
Okumu argues that the appointments violate Articles 10, 27 and 232 of the Constitution, which require inclusiveness, equality, non-discrimination and fair representation of Kenya's diverse communities in public service.
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
The petitioner states that the recruitment of the Managing Director and General Managers is conducted solely by the Board through its Human Resource and Remuneration Committee, and that the consistency of outcomes points to systemic ethnic bias rather than coincidence.
He clarifies that the petition does not accuse any individual appointee of wrongdoing, but instead challenges the recruitment process and its results, which he says are constitutionally flawed.
The court has further been told that the leadership changes have had serious operational and financial consequences for KETRACO, including loss of institutional memory and exposure to garnishee proceedings arising from a prolonged dispute with a foreign contractor.
Okumu contends that the resulting instability has triggered hurried financial decisions that risk public funds and threaten the effective operation of the national electricity transmission network.
He has urged the court to treat the matter as urgent, noting that the tenure of the current KETRACO Board is set to lapse in February 2026, raising the possibility of reappointment or term extension before the constitutional issues are resolved.
The petitioner is seeking conservatory orders to bar any reappointment or extension of the Board's tenure pending the hearing and determination of the case.
Among the remedies sought are declarations that the impugned appointments are unconstitutional, orders quashing the appointments, and directions compelling KETRACO to reconstitute its senior management in compliance with constitutional principles.
He has also asked the court to direct oversight agencies--including the Public Service Commission, the National Cohesion and Integration Commission and the Commission on Administrative Justice--to conduct an independent audit on diversity and inclusiveness at KETRACO and report back to the court.