The Khampepe Inquiry into possible political interference in the NPA's prosecution of apartheid-era crimes has prompted former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma to challenge aspects of victims' arguments.

South Africa in the early and late 1990s was a place consumed not only by simmering violence, but also by an urgent mission to set a course for a new country. Before the ship could leave harbour, however, past atrocities and human rights violations had to be acknowledged.

It was the country's first democratic president, Nelson Mandela, who, in an attempt to calm the heated political transitional temperature, expressed the government's commitment to "national reconciliation" and "nation-building', a position many younger South Africans have criticised and find politically kitsch.

Today, many South Africans view this era as a time of broken promises and betrayed ideals. But those at the centre of this pivotal moment in our history had many balls to juggle.

Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn

Here are Mbeki and Zuma's responses, drawn from the Rule 3.3 court documents in the Calata and others vs the South African government and others.

Mbeki's view

Mbeki's argument on TRC cases is centred on Mandela's guiding vision of nation-building and reconciliation in the aftermath of years of violence, struggle and bloodshed.

When tabling the final TRC report in 2003, Mbeki had argued that the state had to balance the need for legal accountability against the imperatives of...