Uganda: Kawalya Faults Government Over Failure of BVVK Machines

21 January 2026

Rubaga North Member of Parliament Abubakar Kawalya has sharply criticized the government and the Electoral Commission (EC) over what he described as poor preparation and costly failures surrounding the use of Biometric Voter Verification Kits (BVVKs) during the recently concluded general elections.

Speaking during NBS Barometer on Tuesday, Kawalya said the government rolled out the biometric system without adequate readiness, noting that even Electoral Commission technical staff appeared overwhelmed on polling day.

"The government was unprepared for the use of the BVVK machines. They were costly, and even the Electoral Commission technical staff were stuck on polling day," he said.

The presidential and parliamentary elections, held nationwide on Thursday, 15 January 2026, were characterized by widespread technical breakdowns of the BVVKs in several parts of the country. At many polling stations, the machines reportedly failed to power on or function as intended, forcing election officials to abandon biometric verification.

Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn

In response, the Electoral Commission issued directives to all returning officers to immediately revert to the manual voters' register wherever BVVKs failed, citing existing electoral guidelines.

While the EC maintained that this decision prevented voter disenfranchisement and ensured continuity of the voting process, critics--including opposition leaders--argued that reliance on manual systems undermined the transparency and integrity that biometric verification was meant to guarantee.

The ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) had previously championed biometric voter verification as a safeguard against electoral fraud, particularly in urban opposition strongholds where past election results had raised questions about the ruling party's level of popular support.

AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 90 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.