Nairobi — Nairobi-based lawyer and Senior Counsel James Ochieng Oduol has petitioned the Judiciary of Kenya, warning that failures at the appellate level are entrenching land fraud and weakening constitutional protections on property rights.

In a letter addressed to the Chief Justice and copied to the Supreme Court of Kenya, Oduol argues that Kenya's land crisis is being worsened by what he terms "appellate dysfunction."

He says that while corruption in land registries has long been acknowledged, a deeper institutional failure has taken root within appellate adjudication. According to him, irregular titles and questionable allocations are increasingly being upheld on appeal without thorough scrutiny of statutory procedures or title chronology.

"However, my long experience now reveals not isolated errors, but a clear and recurring pattern," the letter states.

Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines

"This, My Lords, is not ordinary judicial fallibility. It is institutionalized distortion," he wrote.

Oduol contends that because land ownership in Kenya is strictly governed by statute, trial court errors require heightened scrutiny on appeal. Instead, he argues, some appellate courts are failing to examine how competing titles arise, declining to demand original land records and endorsing contradictory findings without reconciling them.

He warns that once questionable titles are affirmed on appeal, they gain judicial legitimacy, become bankable and are used to evict original proprietors--effectively laundering fraudulent schemes into legality.

The lawyer says the trend is eroding deterrence in the land sector and turning fraud into what he describes as a rational economic calculation, with syndicates factoring in litigation costs.

In his petition, Oduol calls for clear directives reinforcing rigorous, impartial and sequential scrutiny of competing land titles in every appeal, as well as safeguards to prevent what he terms the weaponization of precedent in land disputes.