Impeachment for Top South African Judge Over Misconduct?

The Judicial Service Commission's Judicial Conduct Tribunal has "unanimously found" that "on objective and proper consideration" of facts and probabilities, the conduct of Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe - who faces accusations of influencing justices to make a favourable ruling for Jacob Zuma during the former president's corruption case in 2008 - breached Section 165 of the Constitution. The Tribunal also condemned Hlophe's conduct in relation to his accusations that former Chief Justice, Pius Langa, and Deputy Chief Justice, Dikgang Moseneke, whom Hlophe had accused of "manipulating facts" and harbouring a "political" motive for getting "rid" of Hlophe.

Judge Hlophe has challenged the findings of the tribunal, saying he "fundamentally disagreed with the factual and legal findings" of the tribunal.


Judge John Hlophe (file photo).

Don't Miss

AllAfrica publishes around 900 reports a day from more than 130 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.