Sierra Leone: Recalling the Dangers of Small Arms

opinion

This article by Mary Robinson is circulated by the Sierra Leone Action Network on Small Arms on behalf of the Control Arms Campaign, and is part of their activity of raising public awareness on the scourge of the wide-spread availability of small arms and light weapons, as well as urging government to support a resolution leading to negotiations on an Arms Trade Treaty.

Remember the excitement nearly ten years ago when the treaty to ban landmines was signed in Ottawa, Canada? What began as a small, grassroots campaign had achieved a legally-binding international agreement to banish the scourge of anti-personnel mines from the planet.

This month offers a similar opportunity to tackle the horrific excesses of the arms trade. Later this month, the UN will vote on a resolution to start work on an Arms Trade Treaty, exactly ten years after it was asked to vote on a resolution to support a ban on landmines.

It is vital that governments support this resolution, and demand that the Arms Trade Treaty has human rights at its heart. Nuclear, chemical and biological weapons have been controlled by international treaties for decades, yet there is still no comprehensive, legally-binding treaty to regulate sales of conventional weapons, from AK-47s to fighter planes. Landmines are one of the few conventional weapons that are effectively controlled. This is despite the fact that small arms alone are estimated to kill 1,000 people every day, most of them civilians.

In too many conflict zones, I have seen for myself how the easy availability of weapons fuels serious human rights abuses. In Rwanda small arms such as the AK-47 contributed to the scale of the genocide.

In Sierra Leone during the civil war, it was clear that the proliferation of weapons had led to an epidemic of rapes and mutilations at gunpoint. And in East Timor in 1999, the militia's access to guns meant that they were able to terrorise the population and, when the referendum went in favour of East Timorese independence in August of that year, to kill them.

The time for an Arms Trade Treaty has come. The uncontrolled spread of weapons is destroying lives, communities and opportunities around the world. And the problem is getting worse. In the five years since 11 September 2001, increasing numbers of weapons have been supplied to regimes that have poor human rights records in the name of the so-called "war on terror".

The resolution on an Arms Trade Treaty has been put forward by the governments of Argentina, Australia, Costa Rica, Finland, Japan, Kenya and the United Kingdom. In doing so, they have made a bold step which should be welcomed. However, it is vital that the final text of this resolution references international human rights law. This is not a legalistic quibble: human rights must be at the heart of an Arms Trade Treaty otherwise it will not prevent arms being sold to human rights abusers; and so it won't effectively save lives.

The campaign for an Arms Trade Treaty is supported by 20 Nobel Peace Laureates and international groups such as Oxfam International, Amnesty International, and the International Action Network on Small Arms. The Treaty these groups are calling for would be based on a simple principle: no weapons for those who would violate international law.

Such a treaty would ban governments from selling weapons when there is a clear risk that those weapons will be used for human rights abuses, to fuel conflict or to undermine development.

There are those who say that an Arms Trade Treaty could never work: that the world's leading arms producing states won't sign it or that it won't make much difference any way. The experience of the landmine treaty puts the lie to this argument. Several of the world's biggest military powers still haven't ratified The Ottawa Treaty, yet it has saved thousands of lives over the past decade. Equally important it has changed the behaviour of every government. Very few countries now openly trade landmines as they did before the treaty came into force.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, conflict has killed an estimated three million people since 1998. There, the UN carries out regular weapons collections, which have found arms manufactured in countries all over the world. Guns made in Belgium, China, Egypt, Germany, France, Russia and the United States have been found in the hands of rebel groups.

The uncontrolled arms trade is a global problem. Every government that manufactures, sells, or transfers arms is involved. Those governments may not see the devastation their weapons sales cause, but we must not turn a blind eye. The civilian populations in areas of conflict - notably women and children - are crying out for a global solution to this global problem.

Mary Robinson, a former UN high commissioner for human rights, is president of Realising Rights: The Ethical Globalisation Initiative and honorary president of Oxfam International.

AllAfrica publishes around 600 reports a day from more than 110 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.