Nations emerging from conflict are not rebuilt by rigidity, but by vision anchored in humanity. In Liberia, it is unproductive and ultimately visionless to suggest that once land has been designated, it can never be reconsidered, even when such rigidity undermines the lives and livelihoods of citizens. Governance is not an exercise in freezing history; it is a moral responsibility to respond to human reality. Laws are instruments of service, not barriers to survival.
Liberia's civil war, which spanned fourteen devastating years, displaced hundreds of thousands of people. Families lost homes, land, livelihoods, and in many cases, entire lineages of stability. When the guns fell silent, there was no comprehensive national reconstruction and resettlement plan capable of absorbing the displaced into safe, planned communities. Faced with survival, many citizens settled on undeveloped land, land that had long remained idle, and over time, they built homes, neighborhoods, and local economies. This was not an act of lawlessness; it was an act of necessity.
To assert, more than thirty-five years later, that such land use can never be revisited or regularized is to ignore Liberia's own constitutional spirit. Article 5 of the Constitution of Liberia commits the state to promote social justice and equitable distribution of resources. Article 7 places sovereignty in the people and mandates the government to act for their benefit. These provisions do not endorse indifference to human suffering; they demand adaptive governance that prioritizes dignity, peace, and national cohesion.
Keep up with the latest headlines on WhatsApp | LinkedIn
History reinforces this point. After the American Civil War, formerly enslaved Black Americans migrated from the South to Northern cities in search of safety, work, and humane treatment. This movement, later known as the Great Migration, was not dismissed as a violation of pre-war land or labor arrangements. Rather, it was understood as a human response to systemic displacement and exclusion. Cities, economies, and policies gradually adapted to new realities. Reconstruction, flawed though it was, recognized that people cannot be asked to remain where survival is impossible.
International and African experiences further affirm this lesson. Countries that endured war and devastation chose flexibility over paralysis. Singapore and South Korea reformed land and housing policy after periods of instability, prioritizing resettlement, public housing, and inclusive planning. In Africa, Rwanda restructured land tenure after genocide to address displacement and prevent renewed conflict, while Mozambique recognized post-war occupation and customary land use as legitimate foundations for rebuilding livelihoods. These nations understood that post-conflict recovery requires meeting people where they are, not punishing them for adapting to trauma.
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
Liberia has now lived with the consequences of war for more than a generation. Children have been born and raised on lands settled after displacement. Communities have taken root. Social networks, informal economies, and identities have formed. To disregard this reality is to deny the passage of time and the resilience of the Liberian people. Justice, in this context, is not strict immobility; it is thoughtful reassessment guided by peace, inclusion, and national stability.
In closing, Liberia's path forward cannot be built on absolutes that ignore history. True leadership after conflict is not measured by how firmly leaders insist that nothing can change, but by how courageously they ask how the nation can heal. Land policy, like governance itself, must remain a living instrument, responsive to human dignity, constitutional values, and the long work of rebuilding a nation wounded by war but rich in resilience.
References
Constitution of Liberia. (1986). Government of Liberia.
United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Land governance in post-conflict settings. UNDP.
World Bank. (2017). Pathways for peace: Inclusive approaches to preventing violent conflict. World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2020). Rebuilding after conflict: Land, housing, and property rights. World Bank Group.
Logan, J. R. (2009). The Great Migration and America's urban transformation. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 395-417.
