A former President of the Court of Appeal, Isa Ayo Salami, has declared that Peter Obi ought not to have been allowed to contest the 2023 presidential election under the platform of the Labour Party.
Salami, a retired jurist, anchored his position on "clear constitutional limitations", arguing that the process leading to Obi's emergence as candidate of the party was fundamentally flawed.
He spoke in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, while receiving an award from the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism presented by Founder and Executive Director of the centre, Dapo Olorunyomi and Motunrayo Alaka, in his Ilorin home.
In a critique of the judiciary, Salami linked controversial political outcomes to gaps in competence among some judges, saying such shortcomings have contributed to questionable rulings across different levels of the courts.
Follow us on WhatsApp | LinkedIn for the latest headlines
"For instance, Peter Obi ought not be allowed to contest the 2023 presidential elections. By the time he (Obi) exited the Peoples Democratic Party primary, the Labour Party had already submitted its membership list to the Independent National Electoral Commission", he said.
He argued that the Nigerian Constitution does not recognise independent candidacy, raising questions over how Obi secured the Labour Party ticket without prior membership.
Salami extended his criticism to broader judicial decisions, citing inconsistencies even at the apex court.
He referenced the case of Kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, noting that discrepancies around party membership documentation were overlooked despite earlier objections at lower courts.
"The register is supposed to be the mother of the membership card," he said, lamenting that such fundamental issues were disregarded.
The retired justice attributed these outcomes not necessarily to corruption, but to "intellectual and experiential deficiencies within sections of the bench".
"Some of them have problems learning. They do not have the background to be judges," he said, adding that there is a decline in the rigour of judicial appointments.
According to him, the expansion of legal education and the proliferation of law faculties have contributed to a system where standards are increasingly strained.
"At times, if you see the judgments, even at the Supreme Court, you will be astounded," he added.
Salami further criticised the elevation process within the judiciary, arguing that vacancies and zoning considerations often override merit, leading to the promotion of less experienced judges over more qualified seniors.
Sign up for free AllAfrica Newsletters
Get the latest in African news delivered straight to your inbox
He cited his personal experience, revealing that some of his juniors at the Court of Appeal were elevated to the Supreme Court ahead of him due to the absence of vacancies in his geopolitical zone.
