Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

Sudan: The Comprehensive Ceasefire


allAfrica.com
 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

allAfrica.com

ANALYSIS
14 July 2006
Posted to the web 14 July 2006

Alex de Waal

This is number eight in a series of articles concerning the Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA), explaining how different parts were negotiated (and especially what the different negotiators insisted upon), what the paragraphs mean, and how they should be implemented. This article is concerned with one of the first and most important aspects of the Agreement, namely the ceasefire.

A ceasefire is signed between enemies who, by definition, do not trust each other. A ceasefire is more than simple ceasing firing or stopping hostilities--it has to include mechanisms to ensure that neither side violates the agreement, and mechanisms to ensure that those who do violate are exposed rapidly, and if necessary condemned and sanctioned. A ceasefire also has to be designed in a way that it can build confidence between the opposing forces. Each side needs to know what the other side is doing, either through directly observing it or through the reports of a trusted third party intermediary. Each step that one side takes, which might make it militarily vulnerable to the other, needs to be matched by a step taken by the opposing party. Ceasefire documents are usually accompanied by a map, and also by an exercise in mapping and verifying the positions of the opposing armies.

The April 2004 N'djamena "Humanitarian Ceasefire" failed. It failed partly because it was a weak agreement (there was no map), partly because two different versions existed (the GoS version had an extra sentence written in by hand, requiring the Movements to assemble their forces--and the Movements' version didn't include this), and partly because no trust at all existed between the opposing forces and the mechanism set up for guaranteeing the ceasefire--AMIS--was not given the mandate or force size sufficient for its task. The GoS security negotiating team, led by Gen. Ismat al Zain, and the Movements' security negotiators, led by Ali Tirayo, Mohamed Adam and Tajudeen Nyam, all came to Abuja determined to improve on the past failures. They did a fine job.

The first plan for the negotiations in Abuja was "ceasefire first": to agree on a much stronger ceasefire before moving on to all the other issues necessary to achieve a peace agreement. In the event, the ceasefire negotiations took so long that the deadline imposed by the African Union Peace and Security Council for an overall agreement was already looming by the time that the discussions on the ceasefire were approaching completion. As a result of these long discussions, the ceasefire is one of the most detailed and comprehensive parts of the whole agreement. It is one in which both the GoS and the Movements' negotiators had maximum input. The main reason why it took so long is that the Darfur ceasefire is extremely complicated and the issues are very sensitive. Literally, these are life-and-death issues, and the negotiators on both sides took them very seriously. And the main reason why no agreement was reached on a stand-alone ceasefire was that both the GoS and the Movements wanted to see the shape of the final overall DPA before they signed up to the ceasefire.

Chapter 3 of the DPA, which deals with the Comprehensive Ceasefire, is the most detailed part of the whole document. It is much more detailed than any ceasefire agreements reached in Naivasha for the South or the Nuba Mountains.

The Darfur ceasefire has a preparatory phase, lasting 37 days. During this time, the parties and AMIS need to draw up plans for how to implement the ceasefire, including disarming the Janjaweed. The responsibility for disarming the Janjaweed falls on the Government (the Movement negotiators insisted on this) but it is to be monitored by the Ceasefire Commission, which includes the Movements and international representatives. Another key activity is verification--carrying out spot checks to see the actual location of the forces on the ground across Darfur. The activities that follow all depend upon the GoS, the Movements and AMIS all agreeing on a "Master Map" of the location of the forces, and this map can only be drawn up when the exact location of those forces can be verified. The 37 days come to an end on 23 June.

Once the verification is complete, any unauthorized movement of any military forces by either side is a violation of the ceasefire. Paragraph 298 of the DPA lays out the "main rules" for the movement of troops--the GoS and the Movements can only move their troops, or move supplies, with 72 hours' advance warning to AMIS and the permission of AMIS.

Relevant Links

The preparatory phase is followed by three phases: disengagement, redeployment and limited arms control. One of the resource persons for the ceasefire talks, Dr Laurie Nathan, described the phases by comparing them to the end of a boxing bout. In disengagement, the referee holds the two boxers apart. In redeployment, he sends them to their corners. In limited arms control, the boxers take off their gloves. After that, they leave the ring. Then, the DPA enters the "final status" phases, which include the assembly of the Movements' forces, disarmament and demobilization, the reform of the PDF and police, and the integration of the Movements' fighters into the national army.

The fundamental principle of the ceasefire is a series of reciprocal steps. Because the GoS is the stronger party, it is required to take bigger steps and to take them first, before the Movements take the relevant step. The first step is disengagement. This has four main aspects, summarized in Paragraph 323.

(1)     The Sudan Armed Forces and the Movements' forces are limited to their "areas of control." This means that they must withdraw any units--usually small ones of a company size or less--that are deployed in forward positions where they may come into direct contact with the forces of the other side. The AMIS Force Commander is responsible for drawing up a map that specifies these "areas of control." One of the major tasks undertaken in Abuja was for the AU Mediation team together with AMIS officers to draw this map.

Page 1 of 212


AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




Rebel Leader A No Show At Key Meeting
Progress Toward Peace in East?
Hospitals Overwhelmed By Violence Victims
Ex-Combatants Complete UN-Led Demobilization Process
Human Rights Monthly Assessment - March 2008