Verna Rainers
3 April 2008
interview
Zimbabwe’s elections have been given a stamp of approval by a number of observer missions from intergovernmental organizations invited by the Zimbabwean government.
But the government excluded many civil society monitoring groups from its invitation list. One of those was the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA), which operates under the patronage of former Botswana president Ketumile Masire and since 2004 has observed elections in South Africa, Malawi, Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia, Mauritius, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia.
Undeterred, EISA deployed an unaccredited observer mission, which judged the election “severely wanting” in fairness.
AllAfrica’s Verna Rainers interviewed EISA’s executive director, Denis Kadima, by telephone. She began by asking him to comment on the statement issued by the mission from the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the body of which Zimbabwe is a member and which has been trying to broker an end to the country’s crisis.
The [SADC] statement is very weak. They overlook crucial issues, it doesn't help even the Zimbabweans themselves to improve what went wrong, so really it’s not helpful.
Which crucial issues have they missed?
First of all, the whole issue of transparency. Many groups have raised the issue of the voters’ roll not being reliable, and not being accessible… Then there are issues of... constituencies, an attempt to cause some gerrymandering in some urban areas. It is documented and there is evidence on that.
There are issues of voter education which didn't take place as it should, to get people to know where to vote and in which ward. There [is also] the whole issue of the role of governmental institutions in the electoral process, creating a strong impression that Zimbabwe Electoral Commission was not independent, nor was it impartial.
The accreditation [of observers] is too selective… and even there it’s not the commission that invites people, as in most countries in the SADC, it’s the government... The commission itself plays only a role of sort of rubber-stamp, because they don't have a say at all - all they do is give accreditation to those who have been cleared by [government] ministries.
These are very serious issues. If SADC is really talking about… SADC guidelines and principles, they must be rigorous, and I think that report is lacking in rigor. They are not even concerned about the delays in the release of the results, which is a problem. It causes anxiety, it causes suspicion, it can even create the impression that something wrong is being done, even if such was not the case.
We don't need those kinds of reports. It takes us many steps back in terms of our commitment as a region to democratic development.
At the end of the statement they appeal to the parties to respect the election results. Do you think that that was in effect a message to Zanu PF rather than the opposition?
....You can only invite people to accept the outcome if, in your premise… you are sure that this was a free, open, transparent [election] with a level playing field... [But] here we know that the process was fundamentally flawed and if some aspects might not have been flawed, the lack of transparency also created perceptions.
In an electoral process… perceptions are also important and in this case when people don't know why the result is not being announced, when they don't know what the real vote is because the voters' roll is not reliable, these are very serious issues. You don't ask people just to accept the result when the earlier steps in the electoral process, the early phases, are questionable.
In conclusion?
As our countries move to a committed acceptance of democracy and clean elections, it is important that African observers take their responsibility seriously. These are not solidarity missions, these are election observer missions in a country going through some very serious challenges.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 allAfrica.com. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Is it not Mugabe and Zanu-PF that need to accept the realities of democracy???? Isn't this what the wait is all about? It's Mugabe and friends deciding whether he steps down or force a re-run. At this point, it is not the people that are making the decision, but a powerful clique that has left their fellow Africans to suffer or flee their homes to avoid persecution or starvation. That's not how democracy works
I think Africans in particular must stop the practice of blatant hypocrisy and shameless display of lumpen thoughts. It is no secret that the Western Countries including the entire European Union and United States are responsible for the current hardship of Zimbabwe and zimbabweans through their sanctions and seizure of Zimbabwe's assets. It is important to note that the pronouncements by the MDC are recipe for chaos. The ZEC has six days to announce its result. Why did'nt MDC wait for the end of the six days?Instead it went ahead and announce its own illegal result. That can never be done by any political party in the UK or in any civilized country.
Not even when the very president of USA george Bush won the first elections against Al gore in court instead of the ballot box.
What is wrong in SADC saying what they actually saw? what is criminal about that?
As an ex serving member of the Rhodedsian Army evicted from the African continent by reverse racism I watch the events in Zimbabwe with smug satisfaction. Look at what this tyrant has created, a smoking ruin from a once prosperous land. In any civilised and democratic country 100,000% inflation would normally be a reasonably strong reason to change the Government but not in Zimbabwe. With all the odious apparatus of the State at his disposal and the tacit approval of his equally venemous neighbours, Mugabe will cling to power through ruthless repression in the true communist way. Buckets more misery and suffering are in store for Zimbabwe and before we tut tut and say how bad this is.... Hey the people got what they wanted back in 1980 so long live this black utopia and Pamberi ne Jongwe! I laugh at the irony of it all.
As a native Floridian of the US, Bush and the American gov't should have nothing to say, as Bush's brother assigned Florida State Patrol to tell black voters that they voted the next day! Everyone knows he stole both elections (2000, 2004)!
Are the SADC observers to the Zimbabwean elections in solidarity with the Zimbabwe gov’t of Robert Mugabe? Certainly not, because like everybody in Southern Africa people want the best outcome for Zimbabwe. Do the observers represent their various countries? Yes they do, because most governments in Southern Africa have been elected by a democratic system. This is a big change to the old system of colonialism/apartheid where the white minority took upon themselves to represent the black majority in all affairs. It is unfortunately that increasingly the white minorities, especially “anglos” like Verna Rainers have resorted to second guessing the Southern African gov’ts. When President Mbeki was negotiating the Zimbabwe elections with all parties, most people like Verna were opposed. Guess what, Mbeki was right to try and force the MDC to participate in the elections. His mission is a success and a justifiable one for that matter. We people in Southern Africa need to ignore colonialist and apartheid people who are increasingly isolated and cannot adjust to the new realities with democracy.