Faatimah Hendricks
9 January 2009
Southern Sudan might break away from the north if the "troubled relationship" between Sudan's dominant centre and regions on its periphery are not resolved, a new report has warned.
The report, written by Edward Thomas for the British policy think-tank, Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs), assesses the implementation of Sudan's 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), which ended 20 years of war between the central government in Khartoum and forces in Southern Sudan.
The agreement, signed by the government and the rebel Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A), aims to share power and wealth between the north and the south.
It provides for elections in mid-2009, and that Southern Sudan will hold an independence referendum by March 2011 to decide whether it should continue to be part of Sudan.
Thomas said the referendum was intended to be a "last-resort guarantee" against failure to bring about unity between the north and the south. Instead it had become "the non-negotiable centre-piece of the whole peace process, overshadowing the [the 2009] elections that were supposed to seal the agreement with a popular mandate."
Many of those he interviewed for the report felt that "the CPA no longer represents a hope for fundamental change in Sudan," Thomas wrote. "All but a few Southerners expect separation, and many Northerners are resigned to or even supportive of a split."
Despite the CPA's flaws, nothing in Sudan's history matched its "practicality, maturity and vision," Thomas said. "International supporters of the CPA need to recommit urgently and thoughtfully to help secure its implementation across the whole of Sudan…
"Sudan policy is not coherent at the moment: it is divided between the needs in Darfur and the need for comprehensive peace; it denounces the NCP while cooperating with its security forces on counter-terrorism…" With the advent of the Obama administration in the United States, Thomas urged a new approach linking policies on north-south relations, Darfur and other regions of Sudan.
Read the report: Against the Gathering Storm: Securing Sudan's Comprehensive Peace Agreement
Document: 'Comprehensive' Peace Deal Was Not Comprehensive
Pluses and Minuses of War Crimes Charges
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 allAfrica.com. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
we africans need to sacrifice our lives and put to an end to these wars in africa. the AU needs to put up a strong emergency deplomatic team to resolve any potential conflits that can lead to civil war in africa and an emergency military force that can respond quickly to any conflicts with an intension of resolving the conflict quickly. we need to safeguard our civilians. if the AU has a constitution, which IT does, then there must be a clause that sammmons the protection of its people. i think its time for the AU to use force on… [Read Full Text]
Active Discussions: Fourth Anniversary of the CPA