A new offensive by the Congolese army, backed by United Nations peacekeepers, against Rwandan rebels ensconced in the lush forests of the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is set to aggravate what is already one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.
While the rebels are undoubtedly a scourge to the local population and a major driver of ongoing conflict in Central Africa, the military action planned will lead to more atrocities against Congolese civilians, create greater numbers of displaced and desperate people and, because of the UN’s involvement, do lasting damage to its peacekeeping.
Unlike Pakistan and Sri Lanka, where the current plight of civilians caught between government offensives and repugnant armed groups is being covered widely by the world’s media, a similar scenario is unfolding in the Congo without much international attention.
In the eastern DRC, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, or FDLR – a group led by some of the architects of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and bankrolled by their control of valuable mining areas – have terrorized Congolese civilians for nearly 15 years. We travel regularly to towns controlled by the rebels where the fear on the faces of local residents is jarring. Among a catalogue of abuses, they are responsible for vicious acts of sexual violence.
The rebels, who number about 6,000, must be removed from eastern Congo, and their genocidal leadership means that military force is almost certainly needed. However, their presence in and among the local population and their knowledge of the terrain create a conundrum for military planners.
When attacked, the FDLR melt into the forest to wait out their adversaries and then return to conduct reprisal attacks on civilians. This happened earlier this year after a month-long joint Rwandan-Congolese offensive. The number of FDLR fighters captured or killed was minimal, but the cost to civilians was immense. The fighting drove 250,000 people from their homes, and the FDLR responded by burning villages and raping and murdering hundreds of Congolese civilians.
This previous offensive and its tragic aftermath demonstrate again that the 17,000 UN peacekeepers in the Congo—the force tasked with protecting civilians—remains badly overstretched.
UN officials have asked repeatedly for reinforcements but member states have been pathetically slow to provide support. And so the latest offensive looks as though it will be depressingly similar to the previous one. The inept and abusive Congolese army, with limited support from an inadequate UN force, will spend three months trying to dislodge the FDLR from the towns and villages they occupy. It has the makings of a bloodbath.
It gets worse. One of the Congolese army commanders taking part in the operation is a wanted war criminal named Bosco Ntaganda. The International Criminal Court in The Hague has issued an arrest warrant for Ntaganda for recruiting child soldiers, and he is directly implicated in the massacre of 150 civilians late last year.
UN officials tell us that Ntaganda’s name does not appear on the official list of commanders for the upcoming operation and that they trust the Congolese government’s assurances that he will not be involved. This is a dangerous leap of faith. Human Rights Watch accuses the UN of “burying its head in the sand.”
The UN will undermine its already limited credibility with frustrated Congolese civilians if the offensive goes ahead as planned. When civilians are attacked, Congolese politicians will undoubtedly blame the UN and the reputation of UN peacekeeping will suffer another blow.
How to prevent this from happening? The international community should take three immediate steps.
First, donors should urge Congolese President Joseph Kabila to delay the offensive. They should then work closely with his government to devise and support a more effective counter-insurgency operation in the future.
Second, the UN Security Council and Congo’s main donors should demand that the Congolese government immediately arrest Bosco Ntaganda and state unambiguously that peacekeepers will not support any operation in which he participates.
Third, and related, donor governments should provide resources for a more muscular UN-led effort to encourage FDLR defections. While the FDLR’s leadership will likely fight to the death, most of the rank-and-file are susceptible to efforts to draw them out of the bush peacefully for repatriation to Rwanda or resettlement inside Congo.
Perhaps the only positive outcome of the first offensive was the defection of nearly 500 FDLR fighters in the first three months of this year—more than all of 2008. Building on this success will do more good for the people of eastern Congo than another catastrophic military offensive.
Colin Thomas-Jensen is policy advisor to Enough, a project to end genocide and crimes against humanity. Rebecca Feeley is an Enough field researcher based in eastern Congo.
Comments 1 to 4 of 4 Post a comment
These rebel groups, whether FDLR, LRA or other, can only continue as militant forces by depending on supplies of arms from outside the borders of DRC.
Is nothing being done at all at the international level - to aid the Congolese government in the domains of:
(1) robust training in credible intelligence gathering re these supply routes ? (2) effective surveillance, patrolling borders in order to clamp down on this traffic ?
It is all very well for MONUC to be palliating the symptoms, but how about tackling the causes ?
While the intentions of this article are good--part of the article is clearly meant to mislead. For example, if you research any number of articles on the Congo conflict--you will see that the 250000 displaced did not happen during the 30 day join offensive carried out by Rwanda and Congo--but to only read this article--you would believe that. The real question is how do we make the UN forces more adept at their mission? Or perhaps the UN peacekeeping forces are not trained to fight this type of war?
Calling for the arrest of Ntanga is controversial since his amnesty was negotiated during the close-door negations facilitated by the UN envoy. Although it is most certainly questionable as to it is possible and appropriate to grant amnesty to Ntanga, this negotiation has made possible to arrest Laurent Nkunda and facilitate the DRC and Rwanda to work together. Considering this background, the article proved to be too simplistic.
I disagree with waiting. For the victims - some of whom even you realise, have been suffering untold horror for as long (...TOO long!....) as 15 years, the Time is NOW!
Look at it this way: if the most gigantic, and deeply-ROOTED Boabab tree is ever to be cut down, and brought to manageable proportions, while IDEALLY it would be great to find some way to just DEMOLISH it in one fell swoop, if that feat cannot be arranged however, there is always the ALTERNATIVE...albeit SLOWER, MORE INCREMENTAL, and as such LESS SPECTACULAR method, of....CHIPPING-AWAY AT THE GNARLED AND MAMMOTH BOABAB TREE ONE-MACHETE-BLOW AT A TIME.
As a black Caribbean woman watching world events unfold, I CONTINUE to be SICKENED TO MY SOUL AND STOMACHE BY THE BARBARIS, SAVAGE, ANIMAL, PRIMATE-LIKE ACTIONS....DELIBERATELY....ENACTED BY MY "AFRICAN-BROTHERS/PROGENITORS."
Truly AFRICAN MEN are LIVING-UP to the DIRT-LOW ESTIMATIONS made by whites - and most other races, of what should otherwise be their natural HUMANITY.
My advice to the anti-rebel insurgency troops? BLOW THEM ALL TO HELL! AND GOOD RIDDANCE.