Photo: MRFCJ Twenty years after the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the promise of sustainable development will be revisited again at the 2012 Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development next June.
Joining heads of state and other stakeholders at the conference aimed at securing a renewed political commitment for sustainable development will be Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland and president of the Mary Robinson Foundation - Climate Justice. Among the organizations with which she works closely is Femmes Africa Solidarité, coordinator of the Gender Is My Agenda Campaign (GIMAC), a network of over 40 women's organizations.
Robinson was in Washington D.C last week to discuss issues of climate change, population and sustainability at a forum hosted by the Aspen Institute. She took some time to talk to AllAfrica's Bunmi Oloruntoba about climate change, how it affects the lives of the world's most vulnerable people - especially women, in countries all over Africa - and steps being taken to make climate change a human rights issue.
How does climate change affect African women specifically?
I came to the climate change issue not as a scientist or an environmentalist but as a human rights person, so I really came to it from the impact it was having on women's lives. I was in Bangladesh and other places but actually most of my experience has been in a significant number of African countries.
I had been working in the small organization 'Realizing Rights' and was traveling to different African countries on issues of public health, women, peace and security. I kept hearing, how [people's] lives are so much worse now because of the change in seasons, the dramatic flooding, the long periods of drought.
It was my realization that this was a human rights issue, because these were communities that were not climate resilient. They didn't have insurance and they were already poor, so they had been undermined in their poverty by the impact of global warming, which is the result of the greenhouse gas emissions from the rich lifestyles elsewhere in the world.
How would you push the developed world to think about this as a human rights issue and to be accountable?
Staying with a focus on women, we're creating a platform of woman leaders who are at the table. They were at the table at COP17 [the climate conference in Durban late last year], and they will be at the table in Rio, and they're committing to listening to the reality that will come forward, and to change their priorities in decision making in light of what they are hearing.
That's why I will be at the GIMAC (Gender is My Agenda Campaign) meeting with my colleagues [next week in Addis Ababa]; there are about 40 African networks involved. One that I am closest to is Femmes Africa Solidarité (which is organizing the GIMAC meeting). These networks have never worked on climate change, but they live in very vulnerable climates. Conflicts feast on poverty. We saw, for example, in Sudan - in Darfur - to some extent it was a climate impact of the drought driving the pastoralists further and disrupting their patterns. So the conflict became worse between the different sectors. This will become an increasing risk in African countries.
We will be talking to the GIMAC networks that are focused on women, peace and security, to keep that focus but also to build knowledge to become more climate-resilient. They must have their voices heard on the climate agenda - so that there will be more money for adaptation; so that there will be a perspective that this is real and is affecting the poorest and most vulnerable that we are supposed to be committed to protecting.
Leading up to RIO+ 20, we want the focus to be not only on large-scale renewable energy in emerging economies like China, Russia and India. We want to talk about the 1.4 billion people who have no access to electricity. We want to get that on the agenda and find the modalities to scale up access to energy, because these people will then immediately take themselves out of abject poverty into a more productive lifestyle.
Do you think you will get more traction if you tie climate change to security?
It is actually a security issue. The UN Security Council has addressed climate change twice. Last year they had a presidential statement - not a very strong one - so it is beginning to realize the security implications, including the implications of huge migrations of people.
That will become increasingly more important, because it will address funding issues and the concern of defense forces - in the U.S. and elsewhere.
What about ICT, women and rural issues: how do you connect those dots, because you are talking about empowering women off the grid?
I don't see that as being a problem. I think we will be talking about approaches that use social safety net systems - and develop ways, through means such as micro-credit, to have people be able to pay for solar energy in the same way that they pay for the tiny bit of kerosene. We can reach the day that the cost of a sudden illness in the family or paying school fees doesn't mean you can't buy kerosene so you stay in the dark.
Solar lighting is much, much cheaper than kerosene - I am hearing schemes that say this is possible. I am not an expert on the energy side, but I am listening to what is possible and I am saying this would dramatically change the lives of poor families and in particular women. They wouldn't have to go long distances for firewood, but children would have light in the home to learn, and they themselves would have time freed up for their own productive purposes.
Can you address the changing definition of 'sustainability' you have mentioned?
We must keep three threads: economic sustainability, environmental sustainability and social sustainability, which are issues also of reproductive health and family planning. All three have to be part of the Rio agenda.
Comments Post a comment
THIS IS VERY POSSITIVE MAYBE I WAS A PERSON WHO BELIEVES WHAT MY MOTHER SAID WHAT MY GRANDMOTHERS SAIS AND LOVE OF MYS SISTERS AS I HAVE NO BROTHERS EXCEPT THOSE WHO ARE MY SPIRTUAL LINKED IN THE LOVE A PEACE OF THE "ALMIGHTY GOD" WHAT I SAY IS THAT YES WE MUST RESPECT AND LOVE OUR SITERS AS WE LOVE OURSELVES THEY ARE THE SLT OF THE EARTH WITHOUT WOMEN WE DO NOT PROCREATE THEY ARE AN IMPORTANT STAKE IN OUR LIVES WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT OUR WOMAN THEY ARE OUR CONTINUED SURVIVAL ON THIS GLORIOUS CONTINENT. WE MUST HONOUR AND HOLD THEM HIGH AS THEY DO MAMMOTH TAKSS . WHEN THE CHILDREN CRY THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO FIND THAT BIT OF FOOD TO MAKE SUREB THEIR CHILDREN ARE NOT HURTING. THE WEST IS SELFISH DISGUSTING AND UNDENIABLY ROTTEN IN THEIR CONVITIONS TOWRSD ADDRESSING THEIR DASTARDLY IMPACT ON THE PLANET. THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES OF AMERICA TODAY REFUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE ANY SUCH THINGS AS CLIMATE CHANGE. THESE MEN AREV FIRMLY INT EH HANDS OF LEADING MANUFACTURERS WHO CREATE AND DEVASTATE THE EARTH. THEY BIGGEST CORPORATYIONS MANUFATURERES THE GREAT CONGLOMERATES THEY POLLUTE THEY HAVE NO REGARD FOR ENVIRNMNET THEY DO EVERYTHING THAT DESTROYS THE ECOLOGY OF NATIOONS THEY GO TO RETRACT THESE MINERALS AND WEALTHJ THEY PURSUE. TRHEY USE BIG GUNS AND ARMIES OF SUPERIOR WEAPONS TO ENFORCE THEIR RULES. THES EPEOPLE US E TALK AS A WAY OF ATTATINING THE ATTENTION OF NATIONS THIS IS ALL SUBTREFUGE THEY GET PEOPLE CONTESTIBG EACH OTHER WHILE THEY EMBARK IN HAVOC DETRUCTION AND DEMISE OF COMMUNITTES DRINKING WATERS RIVERS AND SOIL EORSION THESE GASSESS THE CHEMICALS THEY SUE CONTRIBUTES TO THE GREENHOUSE GASSES THE SEAS ARE SO POLLUTE FROM THE COAST TO THE OUTER SPHERS OF THE OCEAN THEIR GREED SEES NO BOUNDS. AFRICA MUST DETREMINE THAT THY ARE A FREE CONTINENT AND FOGO TH ISEOLIGY OF WEALTH NOT UNDERESTIMATING THE NEED FOR COMFORT BUT AT HWO MANY LIVES EXPENSE AND WHY SHOULD YOU SEE YOUR COUNTERPARTS YOUR COMPATRIOTS BEING LEFT ISOLATED IN SQUALOR AND UNDRDEVELOPMENT. THE OBJECTIVE OF EVERY FREEWIZE STRUGGLE IN AFRICA WAS THE UPL;IFTMENT OF ALL THE PEOPLE. TODAY THIS LONG GONE AND UNIMAGINED WNY? THE STRUGGLE IS NEVER OVER . WE MUST ALWAYS BE SURE THAT ALL PEOPLE ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO HAVE SUFFERD AFTER THEIR PRESSENCE IN FREEING TEH PEOPLE . THIS IS THE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN AFRICA. EVERYON IN AFRICA MUST BE RESPONSIBLE THSI MEANS WITH WEALTH COMES RESPONSIBILITY. SHOULD THE LIVES OF PEOPLE BE LIFTED ABOVE THEIR PRESSENT LIFE OF DSAPAIR BUT TOA CONDITION THAT IS HUMANE WHERE THE EMPOWEWRMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS WAS STATED SOLAR PANELS WIND FARMS HYDROELECTRICAL DAMS THESE THINGS ARE NOT IMPOSSIBLE NOR DOES IT ISOLTE THE POOR IT ALSO SEDFUCATE BECAUSE THE TEACHERS WILL TECAH THE CHILDREN AND FOR THE PARENST WHO NEVER LEARNED THEY WILL LEARN FROM THE CHILDREN. "WHAT WAS HIDDEN FROM THE WISE AN PRUDENT SHALL BE REVEALED TO BABES AND SUCKLINGS" THIS SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LIGHTLY THE PEOPLE CAN LEARN TO INTERACT WITH THEIR ENVIRONMNET. WE MUST TEACH SANITARY CONDITIONS IS NECESSARY FOR HEALTH. WHAT YOU MUST OVERSTAND ABOUT AFRICA AFRICA WAS VERY RURALISED AND THE PEOPLE MOST OF WHOM L;IVED WITH THE EARTH THEY WERE VERY PROTECTIVE OF TH EARTH. THESE ARE THE PRACTISES THAT WERE SAID TO BE SAVGE AND NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHITE VALUES . TODAY WE SEE WHITE VALUES AND THEY ARE DESTRUCTIVE AND FAR FROM THE NATURE OF AND NATURAL LIFE STYLE S THAT AFRICANS HELD DEAR. THE EEARTH THE WATER WAS VERY IMPORTANT TO AFRICANS THEY WERE ALWAYS ASSURED OF RAINS AND THEY HAVRVESTED THEIR FEIDS ACCORDING TO THE SEASONS THEY WERE VERY INFLUINCED BY THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE EARTH. THEY NEVBER OVER FARMED THEY NEVER OVER FISHED NOR OVER KILL THEY LIVED WITHIN THEIR MEANS AND THEY LIVED RICH FULFILLING LIVES. TODAY WE LIVE IN A TIME WHERE MODERNITY HAS BEEN OVER BURDENED BY GREED AND OBSESSSION FOR WEALTH. AS RESPONSIBLE AFRICASN WHO WATCH THEIR DESTRUCTION FROM AFAR , MUST NOT SEEK THE DOWN FALL OF COPYCATISM . THIS IS NOT THE WAY. WE MUST LIVE FOR EACH OTHERT IR SOUNDS LIKE A HUGE AGENDA TO PURSUE BUT IT IS RATHER SIMPLE REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH AND TH LANDFS WITH RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE WHO ARE DRIVEN BY WISE INTELLECT AND SENSE OF AFRICAN PRIDE