Will George Weah Run for Senate in 2014?

Widespread speculation in Monrovia that George Weah, leader of the opposition Congress for Democratic Change, may contest for a senate seat in the 2014 mid-term election is gaining steam as the party's Secretary General suggests the party "will field its most popular candidate".

  • Comment (11)
  • Liberia:  Weah Set for 2014?

    The New Dawn, 27 August 2012

    Speculations in certain quarters of the Liberian society that the political leader of the main opposition Congress for Democratic Change or CDC will contest the 2014 mid-term ... read more »

George Weah smiling.

  • Liberia:  CDC Fears 2014 By-Elections

    The New Dawn, 9 July 2012

    Liberia's main opposition party, Congress for Democratic Change is apprehensive about electoral fraud and the lack of transparency, ahead of the 2014 senatorial by- election and ... read more »

  • Liberia:  CDC Finished?

    The Informer, 9 July 2012

    The poor performance of the lead opposition Congress for Democratic Change (CDC) to regain control of District#11 in the past July 3rd By-election for the vacant seat of the late ... read more »

  • Liberia:  Bleak Future for CDC, If...

    The New Dawn, 17 July 2012

    An official of the country's main opposition Congress for Democratic Change or CDC has predicted the prospects of victory for the party in future elections as a "dark hanging ... read more »

  • Liberia:  Weah - No Space for Rob Sirleaf in CDC

    The New Dawn, 12 June 2012

    Congress for Democratic Change or CDC leader former football star George Weah says there is no room in his party to accommodate National Oil Company Chairman, Robert Sirleaf. No ... read more »



Comments Post a comment

  • eusebio manuel vestias pecurto
    Aug 27 2012, 11:28

    Os partidos da oposição e o governo da Liberia tem que mundar as suas politicas porque a outra politica é possivel e necessária e é imprescindivel para que a sociedade civil possam ter uma vida digna por um pais melhor

  • rooseveltamorris
    Aug 28 2012, 12:08

    I am very saddened and disappointed that in this post Liberia we are still in miss-steps with priorities. Signing of this so called Democracy Bill is completely treacherous to national agenda. Signing of this Bill by the Senate again dumps our hard earned money [tax payers money] in the gabbage. Why, because they failed as representatives of the Liberian people to channel our interest as a top most priority. What mechanisms have been viewed or strategies to ensure that this subsidy will enhance grass root democracy? Is this a ploy to put money in the pockets of their political colleagues who have not been called for job - an adhoc employment scheme !!!!!!!!!!!!.

    This makes me wonder as to how long will we thread on this path of insensitivity? When will we choose to march Liberia's development in a more stemtemic fashion that breeds on the culture of transperancy, accountability and dedication? What a challenge !!!! This is why I see this Bill as a waste of another so desired meager resources.

  • Kayndaemah
    Aug 28 2012, 14:56

    He should, not for himself but for us. The man who would be president needs to show us what he is capable of. If he can get in there and negotiate with his colleagues and make deals, if he can get in there and understand how government works, if he can help discover sources of revenue he wants to spend, then we will know that this man has the potential to be president. This will actually be the first time we might have an opportunity to see him work with equals in an environment other than the soccer environment. If he can successfully do this, he might win a lot us over. The presidency bar has been raised, so we want to make that whoever comes in there knows what he's doing.

  • cassavaleaves
    Aug 28 2012, 01:08

    Hey Georgie, politics is a science, of which you know nothing. Yes, everyman is instintively a political animal, but it does not mean that everyman ought to be a politician. This is not your forte, so stick to you calling (Soccer) and allow those with political character to rise.

See All Comments