The darker the shading on this map, the better governed the nation, according to the 2010 Ibrahim Index, published on October 4.
The Index assesses governance in Africa against 88 criteria, enabling the quality of governance in each country to be ranked.
The maps which follow show performance by the main categories which go to make up the overall index.(PHOTO ESSAY: 2010 Ibrahim Index of African Governance )
Cape Town — Governance standards have improved significantly in Angola, Liberia and Togo over the past four years, but have declined in Eritrea and Madagascar, according to a leading survey assessing the quality of governance across Africa.
This year's edition of the Ibrahim Index of African Governance, released in Johannesburg on Monday, shows that Mauritius remains Africa's best-governed country, with a score of 82 out of a possible 100 on the index. Somalia is still the worst-governed nation, with a score of 8.
Liberia's score showed the biggest increase, from 32 in 2004/05 to 44 in 2008/09, the latest years for which data are available. Angola's score also rose steadily over the four years, from 31 to 39, while Togo's improved from 36 to 43.
All three countries nevertheless remained in the bottom half of the continent's rankings. Of 53 nations surveyed, Liberia was in 36th place, just ahead of Niger and Mauritania and immediately behind Cameroon and Ethiopia. Togo was in 39th and Angola in 43rd place.
Eritrea's score on the index dropped from 40 to 33 over the four years, and it was ranked in 49th place, only four places above bottom-ranked Somalia, where the federal government does not even control the whole of the capital, Mogadishu.
Madagascar, where there was an unconstitutional seizure of power 18 months ago, saw its score on the index drop from 56 to 48, but it remained higher on the rankings, as the 29th best-governed country in Africa.
Africa's best-governed countries after Mauritius are the Seychelles, Botswana, Cape Verde, South Africa, Namibia, Ghana, Tunisia, Lesotho and Egypt.
Somalia is followed as the worst-governed country in Africa by Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe, Eritrea, Sudan, the Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire.
The survey indicates that the continent's best-governed region is Southern Africa, with an average score on the index of 57, followed by North Africa (54), West Africa (50), East Africa (45) and Central Africa (38).
The Ibrahim index is produced by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, which was founded by the Sudanese cellphone entrepreneur of the same name. The foundation describes the index as "a tool to hold governments to account and frame the debate about how we are governed."
Citing what it saw as the most interesting trends seen in this year's survey, the foundation said more than 40 countries had seen "some form of improvement" in the categories of sustainable economic opportunity and human development.
"Generally, African citizens are healthier and have more access to economic opportunities than was the case five years ago …
"However, the category that gender sits within, participation and human rights, makes for less encouraging reading. Thirty of Africa's 53 states have declined in participation and human rights performance over the past five years - notwithstanding some improvements around gender issues.
"Overall … the impressive sustained economic progress and human development on the continent stand in contrast to deterioration in national performance in security, rule of law, participation and rights."
The index measures the delivery of public goods and services by government and non-state entities, using four main categories - including 88 criteria - by which to judge the performance of nations: safety and the rule of law, participation by citizens and human rights, sustainable economic opportunity and human development.
It has laid emphasis in recent years on boosting the role of African scholars in producing the index, and this year cites the involvement of institutions from Benin, Egypt, Ghana, Senegal and South Africa.
Introducing this year's index, Mo Ibrahim said the index had strengthened the assessment of governments' commitment to gender equality by adding indicators assessing women's political and economic rights and examining legislation combating violence against women. It had also introduced indicators assessing the provision of anti-retroviral treatment.
But the survey acknowledged important shortcomings in the compilation of the index: "Many crucial indicators of governance, such as poverty and health statistics, could not be included as the data are not sufficiently comprehensive," it said. "The future provision of robust data, including health and poverty statistics, from African sources is a core priority."
Scores achieved in selected countries:
Botswana - 74
South Africa - 70
Namibia - 67
Ghana - 64
Lesotho – 60
Egypt – 59
Senegal – 57
Tanzania – 54
Malawi and Mozambique – 52
Uganda and Libya – 51
Kenya – 50
Rwanda and Madagascar – 48
Ethiopia and Liberia – 44
Nigeria - 43
Cote d'Ivoire – 38
Guinea and Equatorial Guinea – 36
Eritrea and Sudan - 33
Zimbabwe and Democratic Republic of Congo – 32


Comments Post a comment
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
After having reviewed the criteria of the Ibrahim Index of African Governance, and the kind of "institutions" used for providing the data (the London Economist, Bertelsmann, World Bank, IMF, etc.), I can say that this index shows nothing else than how good a nation is in bending over for the British Empire.
If a country is good at handing over power to its rapists, it gets higher grades. If a country opts for national sovereignty, like e.g. Sudan and Zimbabwe has done, it gets a lower score on the list of who's-the-best-at-bending-over.
Agreed.
Another good example: Egypt compared to the countries below it on thaqt index.
[Of course, those who purport to pass judgement on Africa do consider (occupied) Iraq and Afghanistan to be sovereign countries [which are laden with occupying, foreign forces and are said to hold 'democratic', 'free and fair' elections (under the gun).
And, yes, they count among sovereign countries the land of Pakistan (whose government is not bothered while its citizens are bombed dead at will day-in-and-day-out by foreigners who embrace this index?)
Who promotes such propaganda to Africans?
Why do we, the Africans, get to read about this index?
Hint: We patronize media (like allAfrica.com) with a foreigners' imperial agenda
AGREED to both of your comments; and that's why Africa and Africans should stop such facist newspapers to keep infiltrating into Africa's societies and social structures that are coming from the west. Secondly, Africa should strongly maintain there sovereignty regardless what the west think, or what the west think Africa should be. Africa have bent over somany times, and what happen; Africa is still lacking interms of Development from the rest of the world. All we "Africans and Africa" hear from the west is sweet teeth talking with NO benefits interms of our continent or the people. To tell the truth, those people are very Exploitative. Also, for example, will Britain allows Northern Ireland, Saxon, or Whales to separate from their federation?? Will they?? It will be a mass killings for either states trying to separate from Britain without the west saying Nothing but turning away with blind eyes. Africa should realize that the west is a destructive region towards Africa; and any of their agreement policies are base on destroying Africa. Europe, or the west want NO one to take a prominent step on the world stage without their approval or as a puppet to them - If Africa continues to allow such destructive policies from the west, SHAME ON AFRICA, THE AU and THE BETRAYERS OF AFRICA (that means, our puppet leaders and the rest of Africans who kisses to the west).
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
See All Comments